Thursday, November 25, 2010

Happy Thanksgiving from Dubai!

I thought I’d quickly interrupt my “A Tale of Four Citiesseries to wish everyone reading a very Happy Thanksgiving from Dubai! I haven’t posted yet on Dubai, I know, as I’ve gotten bogged down by graduate school applications and a (thankfully) increasing research load here in the Middle East. That means that for those of you back in the States today was a day for relaxing, cooking, spending time with family, watching football, and, of course, eating, for me it was another work day. I spent the day at the Big 5 Construction Exhibition meeting some wonderful people (including a fellow American) and making contacts for future meetings while taking in the scope of construction products available on the market.

But though I spent my day busy at work, it didn’t mean I was unable to enjoy the spirit of Thanksgiving. Unfortunately there is a rather small American expat population in Dubai so Thanksgiving festivities are few and far between and, like most things in this city, rather expensive. However I did get to spend the day with some new friends, Marina, Armen, and Abiola, before heading to a British restaurant for turkey and football (not the American kind) before capping of the night with a pumpkin spice latte (no pumpkin pie and a nice way to ward off the tryptophan-induced coma) and a little “Black Friday” shopping at the Dubai Mall. Though it wasn’t what I’m used to—no nice family meal, Cowboys and Lions games, or settling in to watch a movie with the family afterward—I could still appreciate the spirit of the holiday as much, if not more, than usual. If you will indulge me now to read further, I will share some of the things which, upon reflection, I am very grateful for and tell a story or two to illustrate.

I will start first with the one that will either make you feel warm and fuzzy inside or roll your eyes depending on your personality. I am very thankful to have and know all of you—my friends and family. You continue to provide me support and encouragement in all that I do whether studying my ass off at Harvey Mudd, navigating the brush of the California wilderness, venturing into rural Africa to learn about engineering in the village, or leaving home for a year to study sustainable design on my own. No matter where I am or what I do, you give me confidence and make sure I am thinking straight, especially when I get too stressed out or spread out to manage everything easily. I know I have often called on you to assist me, and hope that I have always been able to provide the same in return. I know that I can trust each of you and value greatly the knowledge that if I ever fell into real trouble, I would have an army willing to help me quickly. Though I know I don’t call some of you as much as I ought to just to say hello or see how things are, it is not out of neglect or a lack of caring—my thoughts often turn to my friends, just not when it is typically convenient to call (such as midnight, between classes, or when I’m halfway around the world). I hope you will forgive me for this negligence and understand that I will try harder in the future (thought it’s not yet the time for resolutions!). But for being such an important part of my life, I am thankful to my friends and family and hope that we have many more happy times together when next we meet.

I would be remiss if I didn’t express my thankfulness for the opportunities I have been given. I have been incredible fortunate in the past year to conclude a fellowship at a company I loved, CTG Energetics, doing work I enjoyed, be accepted to several of the top sustainable design graduate programs in the nation, travel to Africa to continue a project for which I developed a passion the previous year, and embark on a year-long sustainability sojourn. I suppose some would say I’ve been rather blessed or lucky. For five years I listened to my umpiring boss, now a great friend, preach that luck was what happened when timing meets preparation. I suppose then that I can say thanks for being lucky—I did my part in preparing through hard work and perseverance, and I can only be thankful that the timing worked out in my favor. It has been an incredible yet fast-paced year full of change and excitement, and as I sit here now I can be thankful for the many chances I’ve had to enjoy life and explore this year.

Through these adventures, I have been fortunate to have some great experiences which have shown me other things for which I should be thankful. Those of you who followed my trip to Kenya prior to departing for the Watson Fellowship either from my stories on returning or through our blog may have already heard the following story, but I’d like to relate it in my own words as it was perhaps the moment that impressed on me most just how fortunate we in America are to have the resources we are. Many of you will know that the purpose of the trip to Kenya was to help install solar power for a secondary school in Ngomano, Kenya, to provide better lighting to the classrooms and a new electric water pump for the well. I traveled with three other students from Harvey Mudd, our professor, Peter Saeta, and his family for six weeks—a duration which, according to our preparation at Mudd, should have been more than sufficient for accomplishing all we desired and having a bit of fun on safari too. Well, despite our preparation, on the first day in the village we learned just how different “engineering in the village” can be. The old pump, which we had tried to extract from the well, suddenly broke free from our rig and crashed to the bottom of a 100 m hole.

Imagine our surprise and disappointment—day one and we were already a step behind! And we had expected that to be the easy part of the project! The next four weeks were spend designing and redesigning devices to extract the pump and associated piping from the well. Each week was filled with small victories and defeats as we alternately lodged and dislodged various devices from the well in our removal attempts. Finally, with little over a week left, we succeeded in removing the pump and pipe using our “Rocket of Reclamation,” a Frankenstein device made of old metal scraps and pipe expertly welded together by a local blacksmith. Here I want to pause and say how much this made me appreciate the access to tools, machines, and other conveniences we have in the U.S. Had we undertaken this endeavor in the States, we never would have run across this challenge. Pump extraction is accomplished using industry tools, not a tripod made of three old pipes and some locally-made rope from which dangled a chain and pulley system. Even had the pipe fallen, tools are readily available to help remove it. While such tools exist in Kenya too, their expense and scarcity prohibited their use for us.

With little over a week left before our departure, the team and I worked feverishly to accomplish all that we desired. Splitting our efforts, some laid wire and installed lights for the classrooms while the rest put pipe after pipe down the well with the new pump attached. Soon, we had water flowing from the well powered by the sun—a joyous event that coincided with my 22nd birthday. About the same time, there came a day when the lights in the classrooms had all been installed, three or four bulbs to a room representing a total of 39-52 W of lighting power, and we were finally able to throw the switch on them. That night, as we took our dinner in the staff lounge downhill from the classes, we beheld a sight previously unknown to the Clay School. As the sun set, a soft glow emerged from the windows of the rooms. The previous lights cast only weak rays on the books of the students trying to study late into the evening. Now, beams of light emanated from the windows of all four rooms so brightly that they were clearly visible to us down below. Principal Peter came in beaming from ear to ear to thank us and proudly proclaim that the Clay School looked like a miniature city and that all of the neighbors in the surrounding hills would be asking what city that was that had been built across the way. He invited us up to the school to see the lights at the hour when the parents arrived to pick up their children; an invitation which we graciously accepted.

At the appointed hour, we headed across the football pitch guided by the light of our labor. We arrived at the classrooms just ahead of the parents so as to be in place in the rooms when they came through the gate. At 9 pm, they began entering the classroom, slowly crossing the threshold beholding the scene with wide eyes, mouths agape, and a sense of wonderment on their faces. Many were rendered speechless on first entering and all we could do was stand, smile, and watch. It was not long, however, before the silence was broken by shouts of joy, singing, dancing, and several weeping for joy, their eyes filled with tears of hope for the students who know could study later in the evening. Many words were said which, though in Kamba, a language I have not yet learned, I am sure were of praise, thanks, and hope. Each circled around us and thanked us with words, hugs, and handshakes, many smiling from ear to ear, others weeping. Soon the teachers and students joined in the celebration and we too danced to the best of our ability. When finally the crowd dispersed for their homes and we headed back across the dark pitch to our accommodations, all we could do was smile humbly and reflect on what we had just witnessed.

The remainder of our time we were constantly thanked and praised by the teachers and parents despite the failures (of which there were several) that occurred over the next few days. Joyous exchanges, dancing, and singing occurred several more times in recognition both of our efforts and those of the students—the school had just taken many academic awards at the district awards ceremony. At these events, we saw that all were inspired with the hope that our lights might help ensure the continued success of the school. Such a simple thing—four light bulbs in a classroom—here had inspired in the parents renewed hope that their students may study harder, learn more, and perform better on their exams so as to have a brighter future. I’m sure that everyone reading this is guilty of leaving four lights on in your home unnecessarily at some point, perhaps even now. Yet it is strange perhaps to think that just that which we take for granted could mean to gifted students in rural Africa a better chance at advancing their education and escaping the poverty which consumes their region. That is what we saw. And for the teachers, the light was an affirmation of our support for their efforts. Ngomano is far from their homes, yet they remain out of dedication for their students. This showed our support for their efforts and reminded them that others, too, care about the education of their students and were willing to do all we could to help. Reflecting on these experiences has made me thankful for those things which we take for granted too often in the U.S. Clean water, plentiful electrical power, access to higher education, and, in short, security of the basic necessities of life and above such that we have the luxury to think about helping a village in Ngomano are things that we should stop to realize are not available to all in this world and are worth being grateful for.

As I moved on to China, I found another which I take for granted for which I should be more thankful. In conversations with my new Chinese friends, I was often told how envious they were that I should be from America where I had the freedom to vote, participate in government, and comment openly on the parts of society which I found lacking or in need of change. They also envied that I could travel where I pleased and experience the world—for many Chinese, visas to other nations are difficult to obtain, especially to the U.S. Though I’m sure you’ve all read in the papers about censorship in China and oppression of social movements and reform, it is hard to glean from the papers the true nature of it. While I cannot say to have been personally affected by this omnipresent hand of the government during my stay (save for having to use circuitous routes to access Facebook and Blogspot), in every conversation with a Chinese national I heard an earnest desire for the ability to speak more freely about politics and social issues. They wanted to be able to say what they were thinking without having to look over their shoulder to see who might be listening.

I often criticize political pundits on TV whether they be on Fox News or CNN simply because I’m not a fan of giving an hour of television for someone to stand on a soapbox and shout their opinions at me. I often find them disrespectful to politicians and segments of the public and dislike how they feed on the emotions of their viewers to incite action. Yet at the same time, these talking heads represent the freedoms for which we should be thankful. In the Western world (Europe and the U.S.), we are afforded the opportunity to speak our minds openly, participate in government, and criticize that with which we find fault whether on TV, online, in our daily conversations, or in whatever other forum we choose. There is no worry about who may be listening—it does not matter as we are all able to express ourselves. Imagine trying to put Bill O’Reilly or Wolf Blitzer on TV in China. Do you think O’Reilly would make it through his opening monologue before he was shut down and jailed? Probably not. Though we have a love-hate relationship with these pundits (love one and hate the other based on who you vote for!), they represent that for which we in America should all pause and give thanks. Now I’m not advocating for each of my American readers to flip on Sean Hannity or Larry King in honor of the holiday, but it is important to pause and recall just what their presence indicates. It is easy to get bogged down in criticism of the government and forget that though at the moment things may be imperfect, we can at least express that without worrying about disappearing—not all in this world can say the same.

One more note on China: many of the basic provisions I mentioned being thankful for based on my experience in Kenya are also lacking in China too. Go to a rural street and you will find people in want of food living seven to a room in an unsafe house. Cross the Huangpu River clutching your bottle of water and understand from the brownish, foul-smelling water below the importance of clean water. Watch the sun set through the brown haze of Beijing and appreciate clean air. These are all experiences the Watson Fellowship has so far afforded me for which I should be thankful. I should also add that I am grateful for my continued good health and that of my family and friends which has allowed me to take this trip comforted by the knowledge of their safety and my own.

Well, there you have it—my list and stories of things for which I am thankful. Though I didn’t have a traditional Thanksgiving, it almost seems that being in a foreign country and having been outside the US now for almost 6 months (except for 8 days in July) has given me a different perspective on the things for which I am grateful. There’s an old cliché that you don’t know what you have until it’s gone, and in some ways living outside of the US in such vastly different cultures allows you to experience the luxury of knowing what it is like when something is gone while still harboring the comforting knowledge that it awaits you at home. I think that is an experience everyone should have—get out of the U.S. and out of your comfort zone to experience a different way of life. Spend time in a rural village, talk to people in a society lacking certain freedoms, and observe the environmental degradation of a rapidly developing nation and you will come to appreciate much more about what you left behind.

Monday, November 22, 2010

A Tale of Four Cities: Chapter 1

Epoch of Belief: Dongtan

The Story
The saga of Dongtan began in May, 2004, when consultants from McKinsey contacted Alejandro Gutierrez of Arup soliciting advice on a new development with the Shanghai Industrial Investment Corporation (SIIC). The development was slated for the large alluvial Chongming Island at the mouth of the Yangtze River just north of Shanghai. The catch was that Chongming was one of the largest tracts of undeveloped wetlands in the region and a key habitat for migratory birds stopping over in the Yangtze River Delta; this sensitive habitat was exactly the reason that McKinsey needed Arup’s expertise. Though this was a new venture for Arup as well, Gutierrez and the firm were eager to accept as the potential of creating a landmark development in such an environmentally important location awed them [1].

After extensive field visits and nights of pounding their heads, drawing, redrawing, and creating plan after plan, the team at Arup finally came up with a new concept in city design: Dongtan Eco-City. In 2005, SIIC officially contracted Arup and formally announced the project. Under the pioneering vision of Peter Head, the gentleman I mentioned in my previous post who so eloquently described the “Ecological Age,” and the team at Arup, a vision was born of a medium density self-sufficient urban haven. The magnificent picture they painted was one of transformation for an 8,400 hectare Ramsar site with no infrastructure. From this land of agricultural fields and pristine wetlands, they envisioned what they called a “town of three villages” built with both a plan for the future to become carbon neutral and a mind for the past recalling traditional Chinese values [2].

From an environmental standpoint, the city took as its main agenda creation of a buffer city with swaths of green space, no less than 3.5 km wide, separating the people from the pristine wetlands which were to be preserved [3]. In the urban environment, the mission was not just to create a city powered by renewable energy or one that could boast carbon neutrality—the goal was, as Peter Head described, to create a sustainable city as measured by the ecological footprint of the residents. This meant tackling challenges of resource use ranging from water and energy to food, air and water emissions, and waste disposal. The goal was to create a society which achieved World Wildlife Fund’s predicted target for a sustainable world of 1.9 global hectares per person [4]. For those unfamiliar with the term, an ecological footprint is a measure of the biologically productive land and sea needed to generate the resources necessary for life and render harmless the corresponding waste [5]. To reduce this impact therefore required Arup to incorporate not just renewable energy strategies (notably wind and solar) and zero-emissions transit (both public and electric or hydrogen vehicles) but also stringent water treatment and recycling, waste reuse and recycling, and integration of agricultural productivity into the city fabric. Achieving all of these goals, however, required rethinking the city design and strategies for achieving these targets in the city.

The new city fabric Arup was trying to create required starting from a fresh slate—not just pasting “green” technologies onto an existing city design. However consideration of the technical challenges of achieving such a small footprint while also providing a high quality of life proved too complex for the firm to handle with their existing tools. But this didn’t stop the progress. Instead, they developed a new program called SPeAR to help map out various city layouts and play around with the location of residential, commercial, retail, and natural zones to maximize social benefit while minimizing environmental harm. The resulting plan was, as Roger Wood described, a “linear city” created as a “town of three villages” [2]. The idea was to create three separate but interconnected village centers clustered around a town center. In each village would lie all of the services that residents would need—dining, entertainment, shopping, and even some commercial and office space. The rest of the work space would be located in the town center, less than a ten minute walk from two of the village centers and under 15 minutes from the third. Smart, eco-friendly transit and pedestrian paths would connect these centers, creating an interconnected urban oasis.

By virtue of playing with the layout of the city until they had reached this model, the team at Arup had already set out on the path to low or no carbon emissions. The layout was chosen because it preserved the existing wetlands and green space, minimized the need for private transport, and enhanced the social benefit of the site thereby encouraging people to walk rather than drive even if they would be using hydrogen or electric vehicles. From there, achieving a low ecological footprint meant smart design in the buildings of the site and ultimately pasting on the high-technology to get the last mile to hit the targets. Together, these could create a city which reduced carbon 40-60% compared to a conventional city of a similar size [2]. As the master planner but not developer or architect of each building, Arup faced an interesting dilemma: though they had created an inherently low-carbon plan, the wrong technologies and buildings or careless design on the part of the developers could still destroy their ecological vision.

But not all was lost—they still had control over the infrastructural systems for the whole city. This gave Arup the opportunity to explore systems-level solutions to sustainability challenges. It meant that rather than leaving the choice of electrical source up to building developers, they could add wind turbines throughout the city as design and energy elements to help ensure that the city was as green as possible. It meant that they could design an innovative waste collection system for the whole town whereby recycling would be effected in the outskirts of the city and whatever could not be recycled would be incinerated to provide district heating; very little would be landfilled. Developers then need only “plug-in” their building to the heat source and without trying would have offset a significant emissions load from combustion for heating. Water recycling and reuse would also be integrated at the city level with treatment plants strategically placed to optimize collection, distribution, and sanitary discharge [2].

Yet as any designer or engineer will tell you, it is a big challenge to manage energy systems sustainably from only a top-down standpoint. If demand is not also controlled, then sustainable energy becomes exorbitantly expensive to produce—more solar panels and wind turbines are needed at a high cost to provide energy for peak loads or even just the large business-as-usual base load. Yet demand management cannot be handled simply by smart infrastructural planning. Instead, Arup turned to the only tool in its master planning arsenal capable of ensuring that subsequent architects and developers would consider this aspect of sustainability when working on the project: key performance indicators (KPIs). As the planner, Arup had the power, with the blessing of SIIC, to add in requirements on each plot of land in the master plan for energy use, energy production, water use, and land use. This meant that any developer awarded a plot for development would not only have to conform to local building and energy codes, but also to the key performance indicators laid out in the master plan for the plot. In the case of Dongtan, this would require going above and beyond the codes and utilizing zero energy building principles [6]. Furthermore, these indicators were not the same for every plot. With their growing knowledge and new tools, Arup’s planners looked at each plot and simulated what they believed a reasonable expectation was for hot water production, renewable energy production, energy use reduction, daylighting, and other building performance aspects. Buildings were required also to be mid-rise so as to optimize daylighting, solar hot water, and efficiency gains from central systems. For each plot they integrated these metrics, the sum of which across all of the plots would achieve their sustainability goals—a 64% reduction in energy use, 83% reduction in landfilled waste, and a 43% decrease in water consumption compared to a conventional development of a similar size [2]. If developers were ambitious and exceeded the KPIs, all the better—this would help make up for variability in user behavior and ensure Dongtan would be sustainable [7].

With the KPIs in place and a city planned with a smart layout and sustainable infrastructure, Arup’s target was in sight. Yet they were not quite done. They wanted to sell the whole sustainable lifestyle, not just a carbon neutral and water-saving city. This meant including a host of walkable parks and green corridors with breathtaking views of the river converging with the sea. Curving paths flanked by vertical axis wind turbines provided a green eco-technical oasis, providing residents the opportunity to relax and understand their relation to nature and impact on it.

Second, a plan was formed to ban conventional cars. If you chose to drive to Dongtan, you’d have to check the gas guzzler at the door and hop aboard the city’s public transit or take a deep breath and exercise your legs to get to your destination. A light rail line connecting Shanghai with Dongtan was planned and scheduled for completion in 2009 with the idea of obviating the need for cars. After all, with the expansions to Shanghai’s already great metro system planned for completion by the Expo and for 2020, who would need a car to get to or around Shanghai? Finally, Arup put the final piece of the green lifestyle puzzle in: urban farming. As the project would remove a fair amount of productive farmland from use for the sake of development, something had to be done to replace it. Plus this would eliminate carbon emissions from food production at a distance from the city by producing large amounts of locally grown food. Large warehouses of several floors would grow food in artificial conditions, each encompassing 9 hectares of land but representing 1,000 hectares of flat land. Forcing a natural process indoors is not easy, so hydroponics and other innovative growing techniques would be the key to success of this endeavor. But should it succeed, the impact would be to complete the ecological lifestyle, addressing sustainability from an energy, carbon, water, biodiversity, waste, and food standpoint [8].

When added together, these solutions created a vision of a new city paradigm where people interacted daily with nature, understood and minimized their impact, and felt the importance of careful action in every aspect of their lives. The Chinese garden philosophy of man as a part of nature, not a dominating force, was given a modern makeover complete with solar panels, wind turbines, and state of the art modeling to incorporate natural lighting and ventilation in ways the Chinese masters only knew by intuition. For all its innovation and glory, however, the result still fell a hair short of Arup’s goal of meeting WWF’s sustainable footprint target. Clocking in at 2.3 gha per person, Dongtan still could not be classed as “sustainable” by the definition which Arup sought. However this did not make the project a failure by any means—the result was still a reduction of more than 50% from the 5.8 gha global average and provided a solid foundation for one day achieving the 1.9 gha laid out by WWF. With the foundation of a solid plan, it was only a matter of time before technology caught up with the innovators of Dongtan and provided the final push to drive the footprint down to the sustainable level.

Rightfully so, the plan and framework of Dongtan were lauded by the international press and politicians. Tony Blair and Wen Jiabao remarked publicly on the project, calling it a success for China and the world. The project was presented at venues around the world by Peter Head and the Chinese boasted about it at the United Nations World Urban Form as the first of four such projects to be designed and built by Arup [6]. England’s Prime Minister Gordon Brown even announced in January 2008 that Dongtan would be a model for up to 10 eco-towns in Britain [9]. An office was set up on the island in the midst of the wetlands and farmlands to alert tourists and locals to the project and ten large wind turbines were erected as a monument proclaiming the coming of the new city. With the World Expo and its theme of “Better City, Better Life” just a few short years away, the developers decided that Phase I of Dongtan was to be the centerpiece of the show—a real, working example of a better city providing a better life for its residents, human and animal [10].

Yet as sometimes happen, politics interfered and things took a turn for the worse…

Dongtan’s Downfall
Managing a project in the realm of Chinese politics, especially at the local level, is an intricate chess match requiring the right manipulation of guanxi, or connections, moving with the proper degree of discretion, and pushing the pieces at the opportune moment when a project meets the goals of those with the power to promote the politican. Oh, and a few nights in a backroom swimming with bai zhou doesn’t hurt either. These are the keys, from what I could glean, to getting a pet project like Dongtan through the proper channels. Failure on one of these levels, and the project could come crashing down. The September 2006 arrest of the project’s main patron, Shanghai Vice Mayor Chen Liangyu on corruption, embezzlement, and fraud charges provided this crippling blow to Dongtan. For rising politicians scrambling to take Mr. Chen’s place and rise above his status, even though Dongtan was not implicated in the sentencing of Mr. Chen on April 11, 2008, the project was poisoned. The guanxi was gone, and no one was willing to take up the torch for a project so closely associated with Shanghai’s Lucifer. As one anonymous source claimed, “Dongtan is a white elephant. There has been a lot of talking on Dongtan for the past four years but very little action. As it was the pet project of Chen Liangyu, I think it will happen later rather than sooner” [11].

As talk dragged on, farmers were asked to move and land was cleared, but the beginning of construction was pushed back first for two years from 2007 to 2009 with Phase I completion scheduled for 2012. By 2009, though, construction was not to be as SIIC had indefinitely put the project on hold, allowing construction and planning permits to lapse in the process. With the delays to the eco-city, the light rail to the island was also indefinitely delayed and so 2009 saw the opening of a vehicular bridge but no public transit aside from buses to Chongming Island [11]. Unceremoniously, all mention of Dongtan was stripped from materials, websites, and publications related to the Expo so as not to poison Shanghai’s debut to the world stage as well. The little visitor’s center proudly sitting in the shadows of the windmills was closed and boarded up, no longer heralding the arrival of the ecological age in Shanghai [12]. Today, the only reference to Dongtan available from China’s official websites is to the Dongtan Ecological Wetland Park, a free attraction that provides a natural respite from the concrete canyons of Shanghai.

The reversal of Dongtan’s publicity from heaps of praise in 2006 and 2007 to complete silence in 2008 and 2009 opened the floodgates for criticism and investigation by environmental skeptics into why the project failed. In popular and online media hope turned to hate as commenters accused SIIC, Shanghai, and Arup of greenwashing and overreaching their abilities. Simon Montlake of the Christian Science Monitor accused the project of trying to green China too quickly. For a country with such a drastic need of floorspace over the next 20 years and energy codes and knowledge still lacking, he viewed the project as trying to do too much too quickly for the Chinese market. Developers do not hold onto projects very long after completion and therefore do not reap the benefits from green investments. Montlake argued that without incentives for the developers to go green, there is little chance of projects like Dongtan gaining widespread popularity in the building community in China [13]. As I’ve learned in my research, the market is not yet developed to the point where sustainable buildings command a higher rent premium as is the case in America and Europe. Though an eco-city would likely command a premium for its “green lifestyle,” the amount is unmeasurable for such an unprecedented project—especially one so far from downtown Shanghai—and therefore would present risk to developers.

Another commenter took the opposite stance, claiming that Dongtan failed because it was not ambitious enough. The implied argument here is that perhaps if it had been more progressive, there would have been greater support for the project and it could have weathered the loss of its primary backer [12]. Others took the opportunity to cite the environmental question mark of building a city so close to sensitive wetlands. Though Arup had taken this into account in its master plans, commenters wasted no time in recalling the idea of paving paradise, especially when in 2008 the black stork, of which only 1,000 are left in the wild, was spotted on the island for the first time since 1929 [14]. Though it is unlikely that this contributed to the project’s demise, it was still worthy of consideration, at least by the press.

Commenters took the opportunity to attack the social side of Dongtan as well. Dai Xingyi, a professor at Fudan University, claimed that a “zero-emission city is pure commercial hype…You can’t expect some technology to both offer you a luxurious and comfortable life, and save energy at the same time. That’s just a dream” [10]. Mr. Dai continued that, “True zero-emissions comes with a big price tag. I doubt anyone would be willing to pay for it” [15]. Building on this as a haven for the rich and educated, locals felt ostracized and left out by the project. Not only did they have to give up their land, but they said they would supply food to the city but not live there as, in the words of farmer Pan Meiqin, “we are not educated and we would be useless” [15]. For these citizens, the definition of “ecological living” was described as a place with more trees [14]. Others complained that the project simply wasn’t Chinese—when most of China’s populations will live in urban centers like Shanghai and Beijing by 2030, what was the purpose of building a decidedly less dense, less compact city as a “model” for the future? It certainly was not a replicable model for Shanghai and other big cities [16].

For all of the noise made by commenters over the social aspects of the problem, a potentially more plausible contributor to Dongtan’s downfall came from those who examined the project’s economics. Some claimed that the 1.5 billion price tag for Phase I was too high to be realistic [17]. Others believed that the project would have 30-40% higher costs to occupants than comparable conventional developments and thus would not be attractive except to the wealthiest residents looking for a summer home near Shanghai. While Arup argued that the long-term benefit would outweigh the higher upfront cost, stories surfaced of internal disagreements between SIIC and Arup as to who would foot the bill for the costly ecological development [10]. One person familiar with the situation was quoted as saying that Arup believed they had been brought in as a consultant and master planner for the funding agency while SIIC thought they were getting a free eco-city [18].

The real reason behind the demise of Dongtan may never be known to the press. It matters not, however, as these commenters got plenty of publication and enjoyment out of investigating every angle and sharpening their frustration and channeling it into a careful dismantling of Dongtan’s image and hype. If any good came out of this dissection of the project and the resulting disillusionment spawned by the critics, it was the exposition of a number of issues glossed over in previous laudatory articles on the city. Building on this criticism and the words of Arup and others who praised and believed in the project, it is possible to draw lessons from Dongtan that may benefit future eco-city planning.

What Dongtan Can Teach Us
Expo 2010 closed three weeks ago, and Dongtan is still just a distant dream for a better city. But just because the project has not come to fruition does not mean that it is a failure. As a Natural Resources Defense Council representative told me, even if these projects never make it off the drawing board, they “are important because they get people to begin thinking about eco-cities” [19]. In the case of Dongtan, this has been especially true as the project has both provided lofty goals by which other eco-cities are measured and examples of perils that projects must avoid to be successful. I want now to take a look at some aspects of each category. This is by no means an exhaustive list, and I encourage the reader to consider other lessons from Dongtan based on the history I have presented, the links below, and any personal research that curiosity may spur.

Perhaps the single most important lesson from Dongtan is that sustainability begins at the master planning stage. By integrating sustainable design principles up front, the folks at Arup proved that it was possible to effect 40-60% reductions in resource use and carbon emissions. They chose to give equal consideration in planning to environmental, economic, and social goals. This set up a mindset whereby they designed and redesigned outside of traditional rules until they came up with a plan that worked. While design and redesign is always a part of architecture and planning, it usually is done mostly at the conceptual stage. Expertise on environmental issues may be applied, but quantitative measures are more difficult to implement in iterative design simply due to the time and labor intensity. For Arup, though meeting their targets was important enough to create assessment tools to ensure that the solutions they came up with were optimal and met the planning and infrastructure targets they set out.

The idea of setting goals for design up front is really a key point from which other projects can learn. Arup created from the beginning Key Performance Indicators for each focus area of the plan and then broke these down to the level of individual plots. By doing this, Arup took away the ability of individual developers to decide how sustainable to make each building—they instead mandated the levels that had to be achieved. Use of KPIs in this manner is something that all master planning projects can take and adapt. Arup certainly has done this—I was told that they don’t even use the word “eco-city” anymore in their master planning projects internally. Instead they just do the practices that they developed for Dongtan. For instance, a development in Beijing will be the first in the world to incorporate extensive energy and water KPIs for each plot if it gets approved by the Central Committee. Mind you, this is no small feat in China where master plans are finalized by Local Design Institutes that lack the capacity to model performance indicators to the level of Arup or other firms [7]. The fact that this idea, which has the ability to be integrated into numerous projects worldwide, and the associated modeling is a product of Dongtan makes the eco-city, in my opinion, not a failure even if it never gets built.

Another consideration regarding these KPIs is that while many of the reductions in emissions and environmental damages from Dongtan came from smart infrastructural planning that is difficult to implement wholesale in existing cities, KPIs can help make gradual change possible. KPIs integrated with a good city master plan can help existing cities change over time to a more sustainable mold. Fast growing existing cities change infrastructure and development between 1 and 5% per year [20]. At that rate, a comprehensive, well-considered, adaptable plan can transform a city from its business-as-usual case to a low-carbon model in 20-50 years (optimistically). KPIs can help ensure that the plan works as developers and city leaders change. The KPIs will continue to inform development and track it toward a logical state of sustainability without pushing projects beyond what they can achieve. The KPIs must only be created once and reviewed every few years to be effective thereby reducing the burden on planners to reinvent the wheel with regard to sustainability each time a project is proposed. So to those who claim Dongtan is not a sustainable model because it does not look like a Chinese city, I must agree, but I think also digging a little deeper, Dongtan has important lessons for existing cities in China and elsewhere.

One other important topic that comes out of a discussion about planning and KPIs is that sustainability must be integrated up front as it was in Dongtan. This is nothing new to many planners, but too often it seems that sustainability, especially in China, is an afterthought for developers and building owners. I heard several times in my meetings that once a building had been designed, an owner would turn and ask for LEED to be added on simply so he could get the branding for marketing. While LEED, BREEAM, GreenMark, and other rating systems do lend themselves to being commoditized in this fashion, their intent and true spirit is to catalyze thinking on sustainability. Like Dongtan, they seek to promote the environment as an important consideration throughout the design process. Though Dongtan was to be a costly project, it would have been much more so if Arup had designed a traditional city and then tried to “fix” it by slapping on solar fields, wind turbines, and water reclamation plants. Laying the infrastructure up front is very important. If you don’t believe this from the Dongtan example, the Dubai Chamber of Commerce experienced similar cost savings by including an extra set of pipes when they had to redo their plumbing to carry graywater. Though they didn’t have the money for the graywater system at the time, it was much cheaper to put in the pipes when they were redoing the other piping anyway rather than tear up the wall again later. In the end, when they did get a graywater system, the cost was significantly less and paid off in less than a year [21]. As the Dubai Chamber found, having a long-term plan is key to making “green” save green (and red and blue depending on where you are!). It is more economically and environmentally sustainable to plan ahead and can help ensure on both a building and city scale that updates occur when they are most feasible. After all, the most sustainable and efficient development is not doing what you don’t have to.

Another lesson to be learned from the Dongtan project is that the key to success lies in having a large network of stakeholders. Students who took Tropical Forests: Policy and Practice with me at Harvey Mudd College may remember the lecture from Paul Steinberg about building a network of stakeholders across geographic, political, social, and economic levels to ensure that your support would be a web—if one link fails, the rest will support it. Dongtan is the perfect example of what happens when a project does not have this varied support. When Mr. Chen fell from grace, Dongtan was doomed. With only foreign backers at that point, there was no way the project could succeed in the closely controlled political atmosphere of China. There was not even local support for the project in the country. If you recall, locals felt they would not be worthy of living in the development and therefore avoided it and all discussion of it. This is not the way to build a small project let alone a city. In this I think the blame can be placed on Mr. Chen, SIIC, and the Shanghai government. Publicity for the project was limited to garnering praise for the country and municipality from foreign officials—it was a dog and pony show. They never sought commercial or public interest or investment in the project on a wide scale. Had they done so, then the fall of Mr. Chen may not have left Dongtan and Arup stranded without public support, buy-in from companies interested in locating in Dongtan, central government support, and NGO support. The lesson here is to bring in multiple partners early on to ensure that a project gets started well, accounts for everyone’s interests, and continues even if some of the stakeholders waver or falter.

One subpoint to make here comes from an old adage: “Don’t count your chickens before they’re hatched.” With the amount of publicity Shanghai, SIIC, and Arup drew to Dongtan with their presentations and pronouncements hailing a new ecological age in China, they set themselves up for the harsh criticism endured when the project stalled. Had an adequate stakeholder network been present, perhaps the hype would have been justified considering that the project would have been on more stable footing, but even then it is questionable whether the publicity was warranted considering that construction was still far off when the hype began. For such a pioneering project, the hype may have been unavoidable, which underscores even more the necessity of a strong network to keep the project from failing under the spotlight.

Perhaps a second cautionary tale is warranted here as well again thanks to the decisions of the landowner. Given the abundance of land around Shanghai, I think it is worth questioning the wisdom of locating the city on Chongming Island. Considering its distance from Shanghai is greater than some other available land and that it was on an alluvial island home to an estuarine environment and numerous waterbirds, why would it be selected for development? Consideration should perhaps be given more thoroughly to alternate locations when picking the site of a project, especially an eco-city. In this respect, Arup did the best they could with the resources they were handed. However wetland preservation in city development is not as sustainable as not touching the wetlands at all. No one can really know the impact that locating a city 3.5 km from the bird habitat might have—perhaps none, perhaps some. So rather than risk this, perhaps a better option would have been to look at any one of a number of older manufacturing sites around Shanghai for remediation and redevelopment into town clusters for housing and work. The agriculture then may not have been as obvious, but that is an easier problem than quantifying the effect a new city might have on neighboring wetland habitats.

One last lesson to be pulled from Dongtan is that of taking a holistic approach to sustainability. Often planners, designers, and operators get caught up in the idea of energy efficiency or carbon footprint and forget that sustainability, as Arup clearly demonstrated, is about a lifestyle in the end, not just one or two metrics. In the end, as one friend in Shanghai put it, sustainability comes down to can you live continuously on a piece of land with the resources available to you? Smart design has the ability to help reduce resource use in every aspect of life by infusing into users principles of sustainability that cannot easily be communicated by the presence of a solar panel or LED light bulb. Infrastructure is key as is the interaction of occupants with nature, daylight, and the sustainable systems driving their world. Arup showed that in a city it was possible to address the whole life-cycle of environmental issues from production of water, food, and energy to end-use management and finally disposal management. Lessons from their approach can be infused into the designs I talked about previously to manage not just energy and water but negative effects from biodiversity loss, agricultural production, and waste disposal. It is important not to get too caught up in LEED, BREEAM, and their requirements and lose sight of the broader picture of sustainability across disciplines.

Dusk for Dongtan?
The history of Dongtan is interesting in its meteoric rise which inspired worldwide hope for the dawn of the “Ecological Age” and its subsequent fall from favor in the environmental community. I hope my assessment did not join the chorus of disgust for Dongtan—I intended merely to present a balanced view of the project and what lessons it can teach for future city planning both in existing and new cities. After all, it is yet too soon to dig the grave of Dongtan. Chongming Island is currently undergoing a revision of its master plan, and as of the most recent iteration, Dongtan still held onto its place at the tip of the island. This means that in time there is still hope for this green city to emerge from the fields of the island [7]. Even if it eventually gets written out of the plan, the spirit of Dongtan and the lessons it holds both for smart design principles and avoiding the perils of a prominent project will live on. For those who have already written off Dongtan as a failure, I remind you that I could fill a whole page with quotes about failure all of which boil down to this: it is from our failures that we learn the most. So whether Dongtan succeeds or not is perhaps not as important as ensuring that for a first attempt at a completely sustainable city we learn from the good and bad and ensure the success of subsequent projects. That at least is Arup’s approach, and is perhaps one of the reasons they are still a global leader in sustainable design. After all, when has anything ever worked properly the first time?

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
[1] http://www.wired.com/wired/archive/15.05/feat_popup.html
[2] http://www.arup.com/_assets/_download/8CFDEE1A-CC3E-EA1A-25FD80B2315B50FD.pdf
[3] http://www.designbuild-network.com/projects/dongtan-eco-city/
[4] http://www.scribd.com/doc/40498306/ECO-CITY-A-Case-Study-of-Dongton-Pune-and-CAOFEIDIAN
[5] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ecological_footprint
[6] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dongtan
[7] Personal Interview, Arup. September 13, 2010.
[8] http://www.arup.com/_assets/_download/8CFDEE1A-CC3E-EA1A-25FD80B2315B50FD.pdf
[9] http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/asia/china/3223985/Chinas-Dongtan-demise-is-mirrored-by-bad-news-for-Britains-eco-towns.html
[10] http://shanghaiist.com/2008/06/24/whatever_happened_to_dongtan.php
[11] http://www.building.co.uk/news/corruption-scandal-delays-dongtan-by-two-years/3117554.article#
[12] http://www.spiked-online.com/index.php/site/article/7330/
[13] http://www.csmonitor.com/Environment/Living-Green/2008/1223/in-china-overambition-reins-in-eco-city-plans
[14] http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/asia/china/3223969/Chinas-pioneering-eco-city-of-Dongtan-stalls.html
[15] http://www.planetark.org/dailynewsstory.cfm/newsid/48952/story.htm
[16] http://sustainablecities.dk/en/city-projects/cases/dongtan-the-world-s-first-large-scale-eco-city
[17] http://www.independent.co.uk/environment/green-living/carbonfree-living-chinas-green-leap-forward-435208.html
[18] http://e360.yale.edu/content/feature.msp?id=2138
[19] Personal Interview, NRDC. October 13, 2010.
[20] http://www.csmonitor.com/Innovation/Responsible-Tech/2008/0606/hurdle-for-future-cities-human-habits
[21] “Greening Offices and Clients” Panel Discussion, INDEX 2010, Dubai.

Wednesday, November 17, 2010

A Tale of Four Cities

Prologue
Those who have been following my adventure from the beginning will know that it started with a proposal written last October, over a year ago now, to travel the world following the green sun from east to west as it casts its light on the dawn of the Ecological Age. The hope for this new Age, a term coined by Peter Head of Arup, is embodied in the design, construction, and occupation of “Eco-Cities.” Following the utopian trends of Ebenezer Howard’s Garden City of Tomorrow, Le Corbusier’s Radiant City, Frank Lloyd Wright’s Broadacre City, and Jane Jacobs’ model for New York, these new towns are meant to inspire citizens and politicians to actively seek a better, safer, cleaner, more productive life for all. The difference, though, between these new utopian dreams and past visions is that eco-cities are the first utopian worlds to seek a life liberated from the shackles of CO2 emissions. The ultimate goal is an entirely self-sustaining, thriving community that is powered by nature—sun, wind, rain, water, plants—for every aspect of life from housing to transit, food to waste disposal. If anything is emitted, it should be cleaner than the original byproduct.

The literature on achieving this new way of life seems to be growing exponentially. Walk into any Borders or Barnes and Noble in the US and you will find an ever-growing section stuffed with tomes on the 365 Easy Things you can do to save the planet or comedic chronicles of one man’s attempt at producing biodiesel for his car in his garage. For a bit more academic work, proponents of the eco-city model will direct you to William McDonough’s and Michael Braungart’s Cradle to Cradle: Remaking the Way We Make Things. In this work, you can learn about the concept of upcycling—taking raw materials, making them useful products, and then when they are destroyed reforming them into better quality “technical nutrients” than the raw materials which they initially were. For those looking for a really academic paper, you might turn to Peter Head’s paper, "Entering the Ecological Age: The Engineer's Role." From the founder of the “Ecological Age,” this work describes the need for and tenets of low-environmental impact buildings covering topics from building design and technology to transportation and even food production.

Eco-cities take this concept one step further. The term was originally coined in conjunction with the Arup project for the Dongtan eco-city on Chongming Island, about an hour and a half outside of Shanghai. As applied to Dongtan, the term is as I described above—a vision of an entirely self-sufficient city which was zero net-carbon. Yet for Arup, the ultimate metric was the ecological footprint of the city. The World Wildlife Fund states that for us as a species to live sustainably, each of us must have the ecological footprint of 1.9 hectares. Currently in the US we are about four times that, and in China, about 2.2. Dongtan’s residents would have had a footprint of 2.2 hectares. Though not quite at the WWF level of sustainability, Dongtan nonetheless would have been the closest city on the planet to achieving this lofty goal.

Since Dongtan’s inception in 2006, China has rapidly planned eco-cities—in my trip I’ve heard various numbers of planned eco-cities ranging from 104 to over 170. The exact number is not important—what is important is that the concept of an eco-city is rapidly being spread in the country and being demanded by politicians looking to satisfy the need for growth in their cities. But as the concept has spread, it has also morphed. Anyone familiar with the Sino-Singapore Tianjin Eco-City will know that it is not striving to be zero carbon, but it still uses the eco-city brand readily. So the question now is what does the label mean? And can these cities really be achieved? If so, will they serve as beacons of hope and models on pedestals for future planning and development or are they green gimmicks to attract foreign investors?

The question does not affect just China—the concept of eco-cities has spread to other nations as well (hence why I have funding to study the topic for a year in more countries than just China). Masdar City in the United Arab Emirates, the Clonburris infill blocks in Dublin, Ireland, an eco-block in Mombasa, Kenya, and cities in Brazil, India, Germany, and England are all now using the eco-city label, and all sport different features and targets.

This is the first in a series of posts about the four eco-cities in China I learned about in detail during my time there—Dongtan, Huangbaiyu, Tangshan/Caofeidian, and Tianjin. They are four unique situations and stories, each with its own lessons to teach about sustainability and the future of urban planning both in China and in other parts of the world. Over the next few days, I will explore each of these in turn, presenting both the facts and my thoughts, insights, and lessons learned. I hope that these posts inspire thought about the nature of sustainable development, what an eco-city should look like, and what it will take to get there. I welcome opportunities for discussion and feedback on my ideas and conclusions.

As a last note in this prologue for my series, I will quote the inspiration for the title of this post. Though written over 100 years ago to romanticize Paris and London, Charles Dickens’ words are appropriate here and now when thinking about sustainable cities. Reading his beautiful language through the lens of assessing the challenges associated with sustainable cities, one realizes that we really do have everything before us and nothing before us—all the hopes, dreams, and ideas of an eco-city and not a single completed project yet. And the comparisons don’t stop there, but I’ll leave the rest for you to ponder…

"It was the best of times, it was the worst of times, it was the age of wisdom, it was the age of foolishness, it was the epoch of believe, it was the epoch of incredulity, it was the season of Light, it was the season of Darkness, it was the spring of hope, it was the winter of despair, we had everything before us, we had nothing before us, we were all going direct to heaven, we were all going direct the other way..."

Tuesday, November 16, 2010

The Best Laid Plans...

You know the saying, “The best laid plans of mice and men often go awry?” Well, I learned in my last two weeks in China just how true that statement can be. Out of a sense of urgency inspired by the realization upon returning from Beijing that I had just two weeks left in China, I attempted to cram as much sightseeing into my last two weeks as possible. Combine this with the two busiest weeks of meetings I had during my entire stay in China (a four-day conference the first week followed by 7 meetings in 5 days the second with a day at Expo) and I had quite the tight schedule. But still, I managed to gallivant through the West once more and get around Shanghai a bit. And of course, when you need things to go right the most, that’s when they go the most wrong. Well, if this whole fellowship has thus far taught me anything, it is to roll with the punches, just relax and do your best to deal with what you’re dealt—after all ,there is no use in getting upset over things you can’t change. Instead, find a way to adapt and turn a negative to a positive. It’s hard at times, and sometimes the best you can do is laugh it off, but hey, at least you got a story to share and smile at, right? Well, using that philosophy as a guide, here are the tales of my last hurrah in China.

The Beijing Bus
I’ve already alluded to this story a bit in my “Ridin’ the Rails” post, but I thought as a way to start this narrative about plans and how they never work properly, I thought I’d start with the talk of my trip from Beijing back to Shanghai. The story begins when I decided to visit the Huangbaiyu Model Sustainable Village north of Beijing. I had planned out my train route and cab service from the closest city, Benxi, to Huangbaiyu. Unfortunately, visiting this remote village meant that either I could only wander and take photos, or I would need a translator. After some e-mails with Shannon May, an anthropology student from Harvard who lived in the village during the time of the opening and downfall of the model project (more on that in a later post), I decided to try and find a translator for my trip. Searching high and low, I employed my contacts (namely Jamie and her friends) at Tsinghua University to try and help me find a translator. Though I had originally wanted to make my journey during the holidays when I would have no other meetings scheduled, trying to find a translator took longer than I expected until finally I was faced with having to make my trip toward the end of my stay in Beijing. This meant I would no longer return to Shanghai by way of Xi’an and Chengdu as planned to visit the Terra Cotta Warriors and pandas but instead return from Huangbaiyu and then turn right around and head south for Shanghai. The reason for the quick turnaround was that I had also learned in Tianjin of a sustainable cities conference happening in Shanghai the day I was due to get back. Seeing this as a fortuitous opportunity given the nature of my research, I heartily signed up, paid the whopping price of “free” and just had to make sure I got back to the city by 8 am Monday morning, October 18, so as to make it to the start of the conference (across the city from my hostel) by 10.

After extensively researching train prices, classes, and times, I headed down to the train station armed with a paper on which was written multiple train options for getting from Beijing to Shanghai in time for my conference. I understood I was cutting things close—after all, I was only booking 5 days ahead, not the 10 that were allowed—but I figured that perhaps that would be enough time. Well, I was wrong. All of the trains back to Shanghai which I had selected were sold out. Dismayed, my companion Dian, a fellow traveler who was serving as my translator in Huangbaiyu helped me find the long-distance bus station where I was told I could catch a bus from Beijing to Shanghai at 4:30 pm that would arrive around 6 am, maybe 7. “Perfect,” I thought. So on the appointed day, I arrived at the bus station and hopped aboard, taking my place in my bunk next to the window. Soon we were whizzing down the highway at a comfortable pace to arrive in Shanghai right on schedule. After a bit of work, I was lulled into a nice sleep by the swaying of the bus on the road.

I awoke to the light of the morning creeping in the window to find that we were stopped. No city around, no signs, nothing but forests on the sides of the four lane highway. And on our side of the highway were lots of other cars and trucks, all stopped. Craning my neck for a better view, I tried to see what was going on. Here it was, 6 am, and we weren’t even moving. I had no idea how long we’d been there and couldn’t ask because not a soul on the bus spoke English. If anyone knew what was going on (the drivers kept getting out and looking ahead at or for something), it was never related to me because of the language barrier. All I knew was that we were sitting. Powerless to do anything and without even a number to call to let the conference organizers I’d be late, I did what I could—shrugged and turned to reading, working, and relaxing on the bus. Finally, around 8 am, the bus got moving again. Thinking if we got into the city in an hour I could go straight to the conference (yes, without showering) and still make it on time, I began searching for any indication of where we were. Finally we passed a road sign and I found we were still a good two to three hours away from Shanghai. Well, three hours later we got to Shanghai and still had to take an hour to get from the outskirts to the bus station and by the time 12:30 rolled around, I was arriving at my hostel, showering quickly, and turning right around to catch the afternoon session of the conference. Luckily, it was a four day event so I had only missed one-eighth of it. However, to this day I have no idea why we stopped. There was no evidence of a wreck, road work, or anything. I guess all I can do is be thankful it wasn’t a week or more that we were stuck in traffic like the poor people north of Beijing a couple of months back. I had been prepared for traffic or for roads to be unpredictable, but I didn’t expect that much unpredictability. But oh well, c’est la vie. I made it, albeit late, and that is what matters.

Nachhaltigkeit Means Sustainability?
After I made it to my conference after the experience on the Beijing Bus, I was treated to another fun few days at which I just have to laugh and learn a lesson or two. After racing from the metro station to the conference center, I arrived panting a few minutes after the session had restarted after lunch. Now to tell you a bit about this conference, it was being hosted by the German Chamber of Commerce in Shanghai and DENA, the Deutsch Energy Network in China, a group of companies working in the energy field here in China. I had been invited by a member of DENA and the German Chamber in perfect English while in Tianjin, and had been provided an online invitation and conference pamphlet in English after expressing interest. Well, when I arrived panting in shirt and tie, I signed in and was told that simultaneous translation was available, but only in German or Chinese. There would be no English at the conference. Well, I didn’t race across town just to turn around and sulk at the hostel, so I nodded politely, said that would be fine, and grabbed my headset. Halting on my way into the conference hall only to sample the spread of free coffee, delicious fudge, and tasty finger sandwiches, I entered into a world of languages in which I was not comfortable.

Now at this point I had a choice. I could either sit and twiddle my thumbs or doodle for the next couple of hours until I could easily escape back to my hostel and the comfort of friends who spoke my tongue, or I could march right back out now and give the Chamber an earful for advertising in English and then failing to provide the language as an option. As I was catching my breath and weighing my options though, a third opened up to me. Why not stay and try to enjoy and learn something. After all, some of the slides were in English, some had numbers and figures I could understand, and as I began to listen in more detail to the German speakers, some of the words began to sound familiar. So, armed with my laptop and Google Translate for those words and phrases I couldn’t quite make out, I figured this was as good a time as any to try and learn German. Well, with the help of a kind gentleman by the name of Benedickt whom I met that first day who helped translate some things for me, I actually did learn a fair amount at the four day conference. Furthermore, I had some nice chances to network and even got a free VIP dinner at the German Pavilion at Expo. While I definitely missed a lot of nuance in the dialogues and some of the details, I got the overall points about what the speakers were discussing and really found that if I apply myself to learning on the fly—trial by fire, if you will—it could work. I suppose I can claim that since English and German were derived way back from a similar base I could understand some that way, but I think it’s also a matter of applying yourself. That’s made easier with lots of free coffee and chocolate to be sure, but even so, what I learned and can pass on is not to be afraid to put yourself in an uncomfortable position and try to learn. I was surrounded by Chinese and German only and yet still had a very worthwhile four days. Given the chance, even knowing now that there would be no English, I would do it again.

The Wild, Wild West
After my adventure in German, I decided I needed a weekend out of the busy Shanghai conference life and decided to follow that age old adage “Go west young man” for a whirlwind tour of Xi’an’s Terra Cotta Warriors and the engineering marvel that is the Three Gorges Dam. As I’m sure you can discern, the former was for my personal curiosity and the latter was to satisfy the urging of both the environmentalist and engineer in me not to leave China without seeing this monumental and controversial behemoth. Well, once again cutting things close and underestimating the number of Chinese citizens who would want to be moving around the country on the same day as me, I went to the train station a mere three days before my intended departure date to book my tickets. Again, I found out that the trains I wanted had no sleepers available. On two of the three, there wasn’t even a seat available. Well, figuring that I was not taking a bus but didn’t know when the next time I’d get to see China was, I booked the two standing tickets and the one seat I could get. The following Friday at the appointed time, I arrived at the station and boarded my train.

Well, that night was a bit rough as I had no seat, luckily very little luggage, but a very crowded car to Xi’an. An older gentleman who saw me standing and trying to sleep while leaning kindly offered me a small stool he was carrying which allowed me to sit in the aisle and get a few hours of shut-eye, though I was awakened every time another passenger needed to fight the crowds on the floor to get to the bathroom. At least though I could sit and sleep for a little while. When morning came, I found that we were an hour behind schedule arriving in Xi’an and so to pass the time struck up a conversation with a passenger who happened to speak English. I learned that he was continuing on past Xi’an to see his family, and he said that if you are a Chinese citizen, standing on the train like that for long periods was not unusual—in fact, he called it the “true Chinese way of traveling.” I seemed to be an anomaly in this car—everyone seemed surprised that a white person would ride standing for such a long way!

I disembarked at Xi’an and found myself in a hazy city, bustling with action and construction just steps from the train station. Surrounded by people busily going from place to place and facing an amalgamation of ancient walls, McDonald’s signs, and Jumbotron TV screens blasting ads, I felt a bit disoriented, but soon found a sign pointing to the bus to the Terra Cotta army museum. Already running behind schedule, I hurried for the bus and was soon on my way out of town to the nearby burial site.

After a brief nap, we arrived, and I wandered up a long road, past rows of hawkers selling souvenirs and snacks to the gates of the Terra Cotta army museum. As soon as I passed through the fence, I was in an ancient and unexplained world. Entering the museum, I was confronted with the larger-than-life marionette that danced its way through the Beijing Olympics opening ceremony, but now danced no more and instead greeted visitors to the site.

My first stop, the on-site gallery, tried to explain the existence of these warriors but seemed at a loss itself for the truth behind their creation. While it highlighted the archaeological studies of the site, no compelling reason was presented for why the general and ruler of the area had so many horses and soldiers commissioned. Some have claimed it is a large example of funeral art, others have said it was so they could follow him to the afterlife. The galleries though did give me an interesting glimpse at the site itself and of some of the pieces uncovered from within, ranging from soldiers and their armor to vases and animals made of porcelain, bronze, and clay.

The jewel of the museum, however, was the bronze cart and horses uncovered from the ruler’s tombs. These exquisite pieces depict in half-scale but full detail a four-horsed chariot with the driver in motion. A matching chariot and horses were absent from the gallery and on display instead at the China National Pavilion in the Shanghai Expo.

After making my way through the gallery and past the marionette yet again, I turned to enter the main attraction—the excavated tombs of terra cotta warriors. Passing through the foyer and into the enormous warehouse that houses the collection, I was astounded by the sheer scale of the excavation. The warehouse extends nearly as far as you can see, encompassing a huge area (at least one or two football fields) with rows and walls running the length of the building. In these rows, facing you squarely, is an array of soldiers, archers, generals, and other figures unmoving, focused, and at the ready. Though they no longer bear their weapons, they are still formidable.

As my eyes scanned over the intricate faces and armor of these figures eternally awaiting the call to battle, I was struck by a feeling that I was glimpsing a window to the past. These soldiers were buried for centuries, only uncovered in the 1970s, and were meant never to be seen by the living again once buried. Yet since their uncovering, they have become synonymous with ancient China, informing our perceptions of Chinese warfare 2000 years ago in facets ranging from dress to tactics, armor, and weaponry. They have become a symbol of the nation’s history and a universal symbol of this country and its former kingdoms.

What is most impressive though about this army is the level of detail of each soldier. Each face, piece of armor, and horse is carefully hand cast with no mistakes, omissions, or errors. Each chink of armor is detailed, each wrinkle on the faces brushed into the terra cotta. It must have been painstaking work requiring, well, a full army and is certainly a sign of devotion to the ruler who commissioned the pieces for this tomb.

I moved slowly down the long side of the warehouse until I reached the end of the hall where sits a platform on which is the “Terra Cotta Hospital.” Unfortunately, earthen ceilings and reed mats give way over 2000 years time, and many soldiers suffered from cave-ins since their burial. So here is where the remains are pieced together, breathing new life into the soldiers.

From there, I moved to pits two and three which are also open for public viewing. These are less impressive than the main pit, Pit One, and smaller too. If the main pit has the hospital, pit two can be likened to the terra cotta graveyard. Here, scattered fragments of pottery and warriors littered the excavated portions of the pit with no completed figures to look at. This could more accurately be described as a working archaeological site on display for the public. A few artifacts appeared intact, but for the most part remnants were all that remained in this pit.

Pit three was a bit more interesting. This is the smallest of the three available for public viewing and featured four horses guarding the sunken entrance with a detail of 24 soldiers waiting inside. These were likely dignitaries or higher officers rather than typical foot soldiers or archers given that they were separated from the main contingent.

After taking a last look at the main pit and the ranks upon ranks of terra cotta soldiers standing at attention, I turned back and hopped a bus to Xi’an. The bus took a bit longer than I expected to make it back to town and so when I arrived I had to rush into the train station, pushing through the hordes filing into the narrow passageway to security, throwing my bag on the scanner, and then racing to my gate. I made it with about 10 minutes to spare and so slowed a bit as I moved through the train to find my seat. Sliding in, I prepared to enjoy my night of rest in an actual chair rather than a stool or floor. Though it was a hard seat, it felt heavenly after the rough night before.

I rose early to depart my train in the town of Jingmen—never heard of it? Neither had I until I planned out this trip. It is of no significance internationally, and from what I can tell is of very little importance nationally either save that for me it was the easiest bridge to the Three Gorges Dam. From here I could catch an hour long bus ride to Yichang, the gateway to Three Gorges. Or at least that’s what the internet told me. Having written detailed directions from Google maps on how to get from the train station to the bus station, I set out in the early morning, even before the sun, to find my bus. Okay, first step—exit the station and turn left. Check. One problem—I’m supposed to be heading into town by doing this, not away from it. Finding myself facing the end of town, I scratched my head, pictured the Google maps screen and assured myself that it was indeed a left turn. But knowing this was all wrong, I pulled an about face and headed in the direction that seemed to make more sense. Well, I thought, at least I know where the train station is relative to where the bus station is spatially—I can just wander in the right direction. Turns out I didn’t know that either. Google maps put the train station in the wrong place and the exit on the wrong side, so it gave me completely wrong directions. After two hours of wandering, I finally found someone I could ask for help, got pointed in the right direction, and soon was booked on a bus for Yichang.

Now if you’ll recall, the internet said it was a comfortable 50 minute ride to Yichang from Jingmen. Well, like all buses in this country, 50 minutes really meant 2 hours, and so by 10:45 I finally had made it to Yichang. I headed into the bus station, bought my onward ticket to Wuhan for that afternoon from where I would catch a train back to Shanghai, and asked for directions to Three Gorges. I was flatly told that I didn’t have time to go out to Three Gorges, come back, and make my bus. I wanted to be the judge of that and so pressed for directions but was refused. Frustrated, I left and headed across to the city bus stop to try and figure it out for myself. Using my handy little Mandarin phrase book, I began asking for help on getting to Three Gorges. Well, no one seemed to understand until 45 minutes later, a bus driver finally nodded, saying he could get me there. After a half hour ride across town, he dropped me off and pointed to another bus station. There I waited half an hour to catch the bus which departs hourly for Three Gorges. Finally, I thought, I am on my way.

45 minutes later (now 1:45) I arrived at the dam site. I grabbed my ticket and boarded the dam shuttle up to the dam observation platform. Here I took in the concrete colossus that is this massive engineering marvel. Frankly, the dam is not as impressive visually as the Hoover Dam which seems to grow out of the canyon to contain the river behind. But the Three Gorges is impressive in its span—this river may not be torrential, but it is wide and so with the haze that I hear seems permanently to hang over the dam it seems to stretch forever as it reaches off into the mists. One person I met in Shanghai described it as the biggest factory in the country. It churns out electricity for much of the southern part of the country. In fact, when you look at the energy statistics that say China is 70% coal and 30% other, you have to wonder how much of that 30% is the Three Gorges Dam. Power lines radiate from it in all directions, stretching to far off cities bearing life-enriching electricity.

At the platform is a monument to the dam, though frankly I think it needs no monument. It in itself is a monument to engineering achievements. To contain the force of that much water for so long to pour and cure the concrete must have been a mammoth task, and just to think about it impresses me. Yet if you explore the monument, you’ll find a pond with this little gem of a sign:

I really wanted to jump in and save it. After all, we need care—we can’t let it drown!

Looking at the time and knowing I had to get back to town for my bus, I boarded the dam shuttle once more only to find that there was no direct path back to the parking lot from here. You could only move levels every 15 minutes and from where I was atop the observation deck, there were two more levels to explore. At a loss for what else to do, I figured it was best to sit back and enjoy the dam. So at each stop I disembarked and wandered out to explore and view the dam more.

I want to relate now an occurrence from the third platform which really annoyed me. As I was standing by the railing overlooking the river and the project, I spied a group of older women not far off to my left. They were taking turns posing in front of the dam and snapping photos. Well, before I knew it, the photographer had reversed sides so as to shoot away from the dam. The subject hadn’t moved though, which meant that now I was in the frame. Well, that doesn’t bother me, and no one in China who asked me ever got denied a photo. This group however never asked but instead started calling “hello,” clapping, snapping, and making other noises as if I was a dog. After an annoying minute of this, I turned my head with a scowl and immediately had a photo snapped. The women then went to twittering, clapping, and acting as though they’d just seen an animal at the zoo. That is actually exactly how I felt. I wanted to express my displeasure, but knew they wouldn’t understand a word of it if I did, so instead I just quickly moved to a different viewing area, hastening so they wouldn’t follow. In all my time in China, that was the most objectified I felt, and I did not like it at all. I felt sub-human, as if I were only a sideshow attraction without feelings. It was as though I was back at the zoo, but this time behind the bars or glass.

Anyway, realizing how short the time was, I hopped onto the bus back to town and rode past the natural beauty and traditional towns of Three Gorges. I think this scene is worth stopping to ponder and comment. As you travel through this part of the country, you are confronted with towering rock cliffs draped in greenery flanking a powerful, yet silent river. The haze, be they mists or smog, shroud the scene in an air of mystery, as if each bend of the river is hiding something from the spectator. This natural beauty is breathtaking, and perhaps defined the upstream portion of the river as well before the dam. Unfortunately it is all gone now. You can’t help but wonder either how much deeper the canyons got in this section of the river after the construction of the dam. From looking, it does not appear that water flow has been restricted, but it is hard to say. Little houses still flank the river, the inhabitants dependent on the local environment for survival. I imagine that trees, plants, and fish provide subsistence for these families. Similar communities lived upstream of the dam but were forced to evacuate to make way for the inevitable flooding post-construction. You look at the houses and it seems a classic case of environmental injustice. The families forced to move were underrepresented, poor, rural folks who have zero political clout in China, especially when pitted against a city like Shanghai. The calculation is clear from the political standpoint: satisfy a major city demanding electrical power for a Western lifestyle or allow subsistence farmers and families to live in their tiny “backwards” houses (the government’s term, not mine).

Now before I paint this as a black and white issue (because it is not—not even close), you have to look at the other factors. Certainly the dam does provide a large amount of electricity (though its overall share is diminishing with each new coal power plant that opens—about 2 per week) and helps to bring reliable power to cities in the middle southwest that may otherwise not have enough power. Yet it seems from looking at Yichang and Wuhan that much of the power is going to factories on the river side. It appears that the Three Gorges Dam provided the impetus many companies needed to locate along the Yangtze River where they had ample cooling water a great big basin for mixing fresh water and toxic chemicals, and reliable, cheap power just waiting to throw out a line and drop in an outlet. So in addition to the typical environmental problems of dams (blocking silt from flowing downstream, flooding large swaths of habitat, CO2 emissions from decomposition of trees and grasses flooded—yes, dams are not entirely carbon neutral!) here additional pollution is being added by the factories that arose because of the dam. Now certainly this is negative almost entirely, and again, I don’t mean to paint it as such a clearly bad thing. The difficulty is that it is hard to weigh the value of these factories socially and economically or to calculate how much impact the reliable power has had to other cities in the region. Instead I can only present what I saw, thought, and heard from a few more familiar than I with the project.

But there is another side to the electricity generation, and that is the benefit to rural electrification and economic growth in the mid-Western region of China. An article from today in the Wall Street Journal discussed that China is considering a moratorium on expansion of coal mining—an industry that can barely keep up with the demand for coal to produce electricity at current extraction rates. With a nation where hundreds of millions still live without access to reliable power, clean water, or financial stability, large-scale electricity development is a must for improving living conditions. Therefore, though some were displaced, it is impossible to gauge the importance of providing power throughout the rural regions surrounding the Yangtze. I read an article a couple of months back about computer use in remote China. For farmers, having this lifeline allowed them to learn about government actions and national issues that otherwise they would never hear. For some it was a way of seeing how they could improve their lives and escape the subsistence lifestyle. In many ways, this reflects my own experiences in Africa where power was used when brought for television and computers for education and to connect to the surrounding world. Whereas we assumed lighting was the most important factor, access to the outside world was in the eyes of the teachers and students a key factor in moving beyond the village and achieving more. Maybe Three Gorges has provided the power and ability for many in the Yangtze region to do the same. I can’t say as I didn’t spend enough time there, but I thought I would discuss (or ramble about) it a bit as an alternative to the negative environmental side of the dam project.

Well, to finish my travel tales, I arrived in Yichang having missed my bus as predicted, but not as the woman said because there was no time. I would have been able to make it to Three Gorges and back had she just given me directions up front instead of leaving me to figure it out on my own. Because I had to figure it out, I lost 45 minutes then had to catch a bus at 1 to the dam instead of 12. I hailed a taxi and showed the driver my bus ticket. Nodding, he drove me to a bus station, but the wrong one. Incapable of arguing in Chinese, I got out and tried to catch the next bus to Wuhan from here. After they would not refund my ticket, they told me the next bus wouldn’t leave until 6. Frustrated, I left the station and on the way out was stopped by three gentleman asking if I wanted to go to Wuhan. A bit suspicious but in need of a way to the city, I said yes. They held out a flier, told me they ran another bus company in town and would leave at 5 pm for only 100 yuan—less than my previous ticket. Part of my mind said I shouldn’t trust them, but I figured I would at least check out the bus and the driver. Well, things looked about as good as the legitimate bus company, so I agreed and soon was on my way to Wuhan hoping it wouldn’t be too late so I could still make my 10 pm train (it’s about a four hour ride). Well, the ride for once was smooth and I disembarked in Wuhan with 30 minutes until my train left.

I again hailed a cab and presented my train ticket to the driver which, in both English and Chinese, was clearly marked with what it was and the departure and arrival points. The driver just sat there and looked at me dumbfounded. I pointed to the ticket and to the “Wuhan” side of the ticket and he gestured and spoke as if to indicate that we were in Wuhan. After a minute of this, I dug for my phrase book and butchered the pronunciation of “train station” in Chinese. Somehow through my horrible accent he understood, nodded, and we were off, he muttering probably that I should have said that sooner. Now I ask you, if I got into a cab and couldn’t speak your language but showed you a train ticket for that day only a half hour from that moment, where would you take me? The supermarket or the train station?

Well, I arrived at the station with 20 minutes until my departure, found and boarded my train, and was soon on my way back to Shanghai. Though tired, I had only a standing ticket here and so passed the night crouched and seated on the floor until the morning when enough people disembarked before Shanghai so as to afford me my own chair. And so ended my grand adventure in the western part of China, my last hurrah before trading the Middle Kingdom for the Middle East.

Expo, Day Four: Playing Tour Guide
The weekend after my excursion into Western China was my last in the country, and as a nice sendoff, Jamie and her friends took the overnight train (soft sleeper, for those who read my Ridin’ the Rails post) down to Shanghai to catch the last days of the World Expo and see the town on their autumn break from classes. With three days of Expo experience under my belt , I decided to join them as friend and tour guide. Rather than separate this out as its own post as I have done with my three other Expo days, I decided to include it here simply because many of the pavilions we visited were ones I had already seen. This day was about them and having fun, not me and my research. However, I will highlight just a few more pavilions for your entertainment.

Unfortunately the day was rather crowded, drawing in about 500,000 people even despite higher prices. So after waiting in long lines for a couple of pavilions, we headed into the section housing the “Axis of Evil,” characterized by no lines. We first entered the Pavilion of the Democratic People’s Republic of Korea, known colloquially as North Korea. Here we were greeted by bright colors, fountains, rainbows, and a slogan proclaiming proudly that the country is “Paradise for People.” TVs showed off the culture of the country through its opera and singing, while photos showed the parks, amusement centers, and civic spaces that make North Korea such a utopia. At the little gift shop in the back you could buy for just over a dollar the words of Kim Jong Il or his father if you so desired.

After nearly vomiting from this propaganda, we left and turned our attentions to the next door neighbor: Iran. Here I must say I was a bit surprised and impressed at the focus of the pavilion. Modeled like a traditional Islamic mosque, most of the pavilion focused on the scholarship and arts of ancient Islam and Iran—formerly one of the greatest centers of the world for literary and scientific achievement. After all, many of the technologies and stories we know and use today were born in the Middle East. There were, of course, the typical shows of Iran’s rising power, including models of Iran’s hydropower and nuclear plants, but nothing about foreign policy or aggression. The only mention was a plaque bearing the words of President Ahmadinejead which congratulated Expo and proclaimed it and Iran’s pavilion as a testament to the cooperation between cities and the need for diversity and tolerance between cultures.

In my mind, I juxtaposed this quote with the actions of the Iranian government and with that we moved on.

The last pavilion I will mention here was Malta. Now for such a small country, you might be surprised to learn that Jamie and company had it in their plans all day for a visit. So as evening rolled around, we steered our feet for the European Joint Pavilion wherein we found our miniscule mecca. The pavilion itself was not large—just a film about Maltese history—but it was fascinating to learn about how long civilization had been in the region and all of the inventions, developments, and political eras that had come in and out of what is present-day Malta. We were all surprised by the amount of information in the film and what we all learned, especially because this was not why we had headed this direction. Actually, it was for the beer. Rumors had spread all the way to Beijing that Malta served some of the best beer at Expo, and after having been starved for a good beer in China (all they have is really light beer), I was ready to spend my second to last night in the country sipping a strong European delight. And frankly, it didn’t disappoint.

Full of flavor and filling, we sat, chatted, and enjoyed our last night at Expo and for me, my second to last night in China over a delicious beer. It was the perfect way to end my adventures around the world in this historic exhibition.

The Most Expensive Load of Laundry
Well, getting back just a bit to the title of this post, I thought I’d regale you with one last tale which though very frustrating on the day of its occurrence now is one of those things at which you just have to look back and laugh. After my day at Expo, I realized I needed to do laundry badly. Knowing my hostel in Dubai did not have laundry services, I figured I should take advantage of the washer and electric dryer (a rarity in China) available at my hostel to have some clean clothes in Dubai. After all, I wasn’t sure how long it would take to find an apartment in my new city. For 15 yuan (about $2) I bought two laundry tokens and threw my clothes in. Well, two hours and a wash and dry cycle later I pulled them from the electric dryer only to find that they were still completely soaking wet. Frustrated, I didn’t have time to deal with it then and so laid them all out on my bed with the windows in the room open hoping they might dry a bit while I was out tying up all loose ends and seeing Jamie one last time before leaving.

I returned that night to find, much to my dismay, that the clothes were just as wet as when I had left. The cold, damp Shanghai air had failed to dry them even a bit it seemed, though my blanket and mattress were now nice and wet. Curling in a ball on the dry spot of the bed, I passed the night hoping I might find drier clothes in the morning. Again, no luck. Rising early, I paid another 15 yuan for two drying tokens, telling the hostel attendant in the process why I needed the tokens. She assured me that if I just turned the dryers on for 90 minutes everything would be fine. So that’s what I did. I split the clothes in two loads, put one in each dryer, and threw the switches. 90 minutes later my clothes were still completely wet. I found out I was not the only frustrated hostel patron at this occurrence and so together, another guy and I complained but to no avail. The best they could offer was to have the dryers looked at later that day. For me, that was no good—I was hopping on a plane at 12:30.

So with clothes and a towel still waterlogged, I packed my things and heaved my backpack on. When I flew here, my bag sat comfortably at 22 kilograms of weight (just under the 23 allowed). By reshuffling, I had moved some things into a duffel bag to take as a carry-on, reducing the load in my backpack with the knowledge that my China Southern flight to Dubai only allowed 20 kilos. The problem was that now all of my clothes were bearing the additional weight of who knows how many liters of water (the upper limit was 35, the number used by the washing machine, but clearly not all of that was still in the clothes). Without a scale, I could only hope that my pack was not too heavy.

I arrived at the airport a little bit late and proceeded to check in. There I learned the unfortunate news—29 kilos. Then the wonderful Chinese efficiency struck again. I was unable to pay the extra baggage fee at the check-in desk. I had to leave my pack, go across the ticketing area to the other China Southern desk, pay the fee which for 9 kilos amounted to $250 US, and then head back to the check-in counter to claim my ticket. Now for reference, I flew China Southern over Emirates, my preferred airline, because the ticket price was $450 instead of $750. This baggage overage pretty much wiped out that savings and almost means I should have flown Emirates and gotten some miles (and pampering) for the flight! After all, they allow two bags checked, each of 23 kilos, so I would have been fine with a little rearranging at the airport lobby.

Steaming from the whole experience, I tried to cool off before the flight so as to enjoy my trip to Guangzhou and then on to Dubai. It took a while, but I managed. Now, I call the story “My Most Expensive Load of Laundry” ever simply because the broken dryer caused me such an overweight fee. Let’s put all of this in context:

Load of laundry at HMC (wash and dry): $0.75
If you do three dry cycles: $1.25
Load of laundry at the hostel: $4.50
With the overweight baggage fee: $268.83

The way I see it, that load of laundry cost me $268.83. And the best part? My clothes weren’t even clean when I reached Dubai—at least they didn’t smell like it anyway. Packing tightly all of that wet luggage for 18 hours produces a nice mildew smell that lingers on clothing until adequately aired out for a few days! But like I said up front, there is no use in staying angry about the whole episode. It’s a fun story now to tell, laugh at, and teach the importance of knowing beforehand what overweight baggage fees will be on airlines!

Summing Up Shanghai
Well, that’s it for Shanghai, or in the words of a famous cartoon pig, “Th-th-th-th-that’s all folks!” I’ve taken you from my arrival to departure in Shanghai and shared some fun stories along the way as well as some insights about green buildings in China. Now this isn’t my last post about China—you’ll find I’ve got a long wrap-up still in the works, but it won’t focus on Shanghai or my travels. Instead it will look more at the question of eco-cities and the lessons we can learn for China and the world. That’ll start tomorrow and go for a couple of days (like I said, it’s long even for me!).

But to wrap up Shanghai, if anyone is planning to travel there, here are a few resources I found useful in my stay:

1. Lonely Planet—I know I’ve already endorsed this for helping me find restaurants, but the detailed information on tourist sites, shopping, restaurants, and everything in the city proved invaluable during my stay. I recommend grabbing a guide if you’re making a trip.

2. Time Out, That’s Shanghai, NextStep, and SmartShanghai—These guides can be found at any upscale hotels in the city and feature weekly deals, hotspots, and specials for enjoyment during your stay. They are a great way to find out what’s happening in town.

3. ExploreShanghai—This website has a great interactive metro map that displays fares and transit times between any two stations. Great for figuring out how to get around.

4. Shanghai Bus Routes—Another great transit help, this website offers bus timetables and route information in English. Again, good for planning but be forewarned that there is no English once you get on the bus—you have to know where to get off.

A last note about Shanghai, and unfortunately a little bit of a turn from the light side of this post to a bit more serious topic. My stay in China has made me much more attuned to the current events and news in that part of the world, and this morning as I looked through the Wall Street Journal’s China page, I came across this news story. I know I have mentioned before that building codes and safety are lacking in China, and one aspect of that is during the construction process. Unskilled laborers are brought from poorer areas of the country, forced to work long hours with limited supervision, and have their pay withheld until the job is done to prevent them leaving. I am a firm believer that these conditions were part of the perfect storm that led to the high-rise fire this article discusses. The article credits an unlicensed, unskilled welder (to which I ask how many welders are licensed or skilled?) with starting a fire in a high-rise under renovation. The fire quickly spread to the bamboo scaffolding (nice to use a renewable material, but here is the downside when not fireproofed) engulfing the building in flames, killing 53 and sending at least 70 more to the hospital. Stories like this are too common in China—there was a building collapse a couple months back in Xi'an and there was another in Shanghai 13 months before my arrival. They speak to the broader issue I have raised several times in my blog about a lack of codes and oversight in construction, planning, and design. The rapid pace of development has been achieved with a lack of quality both in materials (which may have contributed to yesterday’s inferno) and in construction practices. Though the government has vowed to investigate the blaze and punish those at fault, and residents are eagerly awaiting the government’s report, I am dubious that full disclosure will occur or that it will reveal anything wrong with the system. Likely the welder and his supervisor will be punished, but no reform of codes or practices will be implemented. After all, China does have a practice of both punishing those who commit the wrongs and those who bring them to light through social protest, online media, and community support groups (recent articles in the Journal have highlighted these practices especially in relation to Liu Xiaobo, the Nobel Peace Prize winner, and one man jailed for calling for information, community support, and reform following the tainted milk scandal two years ago).

I didn’t mean to dampen the mood too much, but really to point out that for those who travel to China it is easy to see the country as a great, affordable tourist destination. It is easy to be enamored with the history and flashy lights and ignore the real social and developmental issues lurking beneath the surface. China will be key to world peace and prosperity in the coming decades, and as it gains power, it will gain a greater role in the spotlight and more of these social and civic issues will come to light. I encourage everyone to keep an eye on how the government and people of this large nation respond to the challenges of growth, development, industrialization, and rise to prominence in the next 20 years. The ability of the government to manage these various pressures from within and without could well shape much of the political and economic landscape on a world scale. As one architect told me, “If China sneezes, the world will get a bad cold.”